From: Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@enter.net>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Strange linux-next build error
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 21:37:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200805032137.09302.dhazelton@enter.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080503224018.GB18344@elte.hu>
On Saturday 03 May 2008 18:40:18 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@enter.net> wrote:
> > > Can you try to do a:
> > > make V=1 and post the output a few screen fulls before and until
> > > the bug triggers.
> > > They I will see if I can work out what is happening.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Sam
> >
> > I've been unable to trigger it with "make V=1 bzImage" - does the
> > verbosity change, somehow, the default number of makes that get run ?
> >
> > If it does, I could try adding -j2 or similar to see if that causes it
> > to trigger.
>
> try something like:
>
> make -j2 V=1 bzImage >log.txt 2>&1
>
> and see whether the error shows up in log.txt. Console output caused by
> the increased verbosity (especially if it's a slower console like an
> xterm) can hide build races.
>
> Ingo
And this appears to have been a false alarm. For the tests I did a clean pull
of the tree and started the build. When I kept *NOT* getting a build error on
the clean tree I started checking permissions and, while the files that this
error was happening for (and the containing directory) all had good
permissions, the correct ownerand all that - so I didn't look deeper. On
doing a deeper look it seems that there were some files and directories that
belonged to "root" and had 0644 for permissions.
After doing "make mrproper" and the reconfiguration I reset the owner/group on
the entire tree of files to be non-root and the build (at -j4) has finished
without a problem.
Sorry about that.
DRH
--
Dialup is like pissing through a pipette. Slow and excruciatingly painful.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-04 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-03 5:21 Daniel Hazelton
2008-05-03 5:52 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-05-03 6:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-03 16:10 ` Daniel Hazelton
2008-05-03 22:25 ` Daniel Hazelton
2008-05-03 22:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-04 1:37 ` Daniel Hazelton [this message]
2008-05-04 5:36 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200805032137.09302.dhazelton@enter.net \
--to=dhazelton@enter.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®