From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
Subject: Re: Additional kconfig targets (cloneconfig, nonint_oldconfig etc)
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 23:49:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080503214922.GB24283@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200805010640.33973.zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Hi Roman.
> The patch I've seen for the last point put it into conf.c, which is the wrong
> place for it. For this sort of thing we should create a small query tool,
> which then can export all sorts of information.
> If we silence the defconfig output (which IMO is a good thing, as I don't
> think anyone looked at the output seriously for a long time and the current
> behaviour has purely historical reasons), it would also open up the
> possibility to separate it from conf.c.
aconf is now ready to take care of defconfig, randconfig and all*config.
That leaves us with two simple tasks for conf.c:
config and oldconfig
[silentoldconfig is gone as oldconfig is 'silent' now].
aconf can take a base config for all the targets and avoids being
clever where to locate it. (Read: does not use DEFCONFIG_LIST).
I dunno if this is what you had in mind but I certainly like the result.
A cleaned up set of patches will soon hit the kbuild list.
> This also fits into an idea I'm playing with to extend the .config format like
> this:
>
> %defaultmode: mod
> CONFIG_FOO=n
>
I understand the solution that you describe but I fail to see the
usefulness of it.
Can I request you to elaborate a bit more how you see it used.
I can give it a shot if I see it solving a real issue.
> Basically this could replace "make allmodconfig KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG=..." and the
> current way to produce an allmodconfig would be replaced by a dedicated
> function.
This part I did not understand either. I am aware of the current behaviour
but do not get the "dedicated function" thing.
Thanks in advance,
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-03 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-29 18:35 Sam Ravnborg
2008-04-29 21:24 ` Andres Salomon
2008-04-30 6:35 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-04-30 14:43 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-04-30 10:45 ` SL Baur
2008-04-30 15:01 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-04-30 20:32 ` SL Baur
2008-04-30 20:35 ` Roland McGrath
2008-04-30 20:37 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-04-30 14:44 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-05-02 10:56 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-01 4:40 ` Roman Zippel
2008-05-01 6:12 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-03 21:49 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2008-05-02 19:09 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-21 20:47 ` Andres Salomon
2008-05-21 21:11 ` Dave Jones
2008-05-21 21:38 ` Andres Salomon
2008-05-22 19:06 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-05-21 21:47 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-06-13 18:10 ` Andres Salomon
2008-06-13 18:14 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080503214922.GB24283@uranus.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=dilinger@queued.net \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®