From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762612AbYEFFtG (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2008 01:49:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762611AbYEFFss (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2008 01:48:48 -0400 Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:36097 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762592AbYEFFsq (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2008 01:48:46 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 15:48:30 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Andreas Mohr , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.26-rc1 Message-Id: <20080506154830.aa7e1b2d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20080506001751.GA22499@elte.hu> References: <8287f540805041818g534c4e02qaadb0e749c5f3439@mail.gmail.com> <20080505053935.GA15734@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> <20080505073030.GI3350@elte.hu> <20080506095122.860796f6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080506001751.GA22499@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0beta3 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__6_May_2008_15_48_30_+1000_nEr/skdXXMzJ1AHz" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Tue__6_May_2008_15_48_30_+1000_nEr/skdXXMzJ1AHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ingo, On Tue, 6 May 2008 02:17:52 +0200 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Stephen Rothwell wrote: >=20 > > This was discovered in linux-next and a patch posted on March 28 ... >=20 > hm, i do searches on lkml before posting patches but i cannot do=20 > searches on _every_ mailing list where patches might show up. There's=20 > just 30 hours in a day ;-) They were both posted on lkml ... and I do appreciate your efforts. > perhaps linux-next should propagate all add-on fix patches it is=20 > carrying against subsystem trees if they are still relevant to -git,=20 > once the subsystem tree goes to -git, and re-post them to lkml in that=20 > case, to avoid duplicative work? Once it's on lkml i think most=20 > subsystem maintainers will find any missing patches. See above and what you quoted below. > > I (and I assume Andrew) have been carrying them since then but noone=20 > > took them up. I guess (as Andrew pointed out to me) I should have=20 > > pushed them. >=20 > yeah. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Tue__6_May_2008_15_48_30_+1000_nEr/skdXXMzJ1AHz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIH/E6TgG2atn1QN8RAj/pAJ4u3zXPqFEN5M/bQhl4FGpB0tw+swCeIdiC B7+F9+2ddKiB5Fv9y8EqFHw= =mG8l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__6_May_2008_15_48_30_+1000_nEr/skdXXMzJ1AHz--