From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756534AbYEFHS3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2008 03:18:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753007AbYEFHSV (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2008 03:18:21 -0400 Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:60163 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752933AbYEFHSU (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2008 03:18:20 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 17:18:07 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Andrew Morton Cc: Liam Girdwood , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, sfrench@us.ibm.com, swhiteho@redhat.com, stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de, jeff@garzik.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, drzeus-list@drzeus.cx, jack@ucw.cz, cbou@mail.ru, jens.axboe@oracle.com, ericvh@gmail.com, wim@iguana.be, chris@zankel.net, nico@cam.org, penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, clameter@sgi.com, ezk@cs.sunysb.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com Subject: Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next Message-Id: <20080506171807.8ecb9e60.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20080505225009.46f7be15.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080502151206.b40f77ea.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1210006336.3923.26.camel@odin> <20080505105728.c8f7590a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080506144549.b06ded7c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080505225009.46f7be15.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0beta3 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__6_May_2008_17_18_07_+1000_j2UzSryjUw7hTy1n" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Tue__6_May_2008_17_18_07_+1000_j2UzSryjUw7hTy1n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 5 May 2008 22:50:09 -0700 Andrew Morton = wrote: > > On Tue, 6 May 2008 14:45:49 +1000 Stephen Rothwell = wrote: >=20 > > Was there a request in there for linux-next as well? ;-) >=20 > I thought about it. It's a once-off tree rather than a permanent thing.= =20 > Do you do those? I do, as long as I am kept informed. Willy's semaphore trees for example. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Tue__6_May_2008_17_18_07_+1000_j2UzSryjUw7hTy1n Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIIAY0TgG2atn1QN8RAntkAJ0bwypnFJjkdchch+0as9KBmfpTHACfTh5v qycW1Js5odMoQXkknYiTgbU= =aRg3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__6_May_2008_17_18_07_+1000_j2UzSryjUw7hTy1n--