From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: menage@google.com, seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com, mingo@elte.hu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level control file
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 20:40:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080506204054.564fff32.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080506183138.546f42d9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew wrote:
> There is a patch in linux-next called "cpuset: system sets" which will
> conflict with your change.
Yeah - I was looking at that patch earlier today, when I was
scratching my head, trying to figure out what I broke with
mmotm.
I still don't like it. The conversation evolved into a couple of
positions, mine and someone elses, I forget whom. From what I
can recall now, neither of those positions endorsed the original
patch, as you have it. Then the conversation died out, as all
parties involved other than perhaps myself prefer to work on stuff
that can result in successful patches, rather than ongoing debates.
What's the easiest way to get from where we are now, to a world
without that patch?
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-07 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-07 1:08 Paul Menage
2008-05-07 1:21 ` Li Zefan
2008-05-07 1:31 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 1:40 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2008-05-07 3:38 ` Reverting per-cpuset "system" (IRQ affinity) patch (was: Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level control file) Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 3:44 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 3:52 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 6:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-08 17:56 ` Reverting per-cpuset "system" (IRQ affinity) patch Max Krasnyansky
2008-05-09 10:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-09 11:26 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-21 0:46 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-05-07 1:38 ` [PATCH] Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level control file Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 1:41 ` Paul Menage
2008-05-07 9:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-07 15:08 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 1:46 ` Li Zefan
2008-05-07 1:49 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 1:51 ` Paul Menage
2008-05-07 1:58 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 2:08 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 2:11 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 2:15 ` Paul Menage
2008-05-07 2:28 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 2:32 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 2:12 ` Li Zefan
2008-05-07 2:17 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 2:27 ` Hidetoshi Seto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080506204054.564fff32.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome