From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934040AbYEGWuJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2008 18:50:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757487AbYEGWtr (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2008 18:49:47 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:39797 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757294AbYEGWtp (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2008 18:49:45 -0400 Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 15:49:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20080507.154939.172601631.davem@davemloft.net> To: mikpe@it.uu.se Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 lost half the RAM on UltraSPARC 5 From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <18465.63175.561233.228014@alkaid.it.uu.se> References: <18465.63175.561233.228014@alkaid.it.uu.se> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Mikael Pettersson Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 20:36:55 +0200 > Now that 2.6.26-rc1 boots on my Ultra5, I noticed that it > reports having only 128MB RAM, while earlier kernels reported > the correct amount: 256MB. > > A diff of the dmesg output from 2.6.25 and 2.6.26-rc1 shows: Thanks for the report, I'll try to track this one down. I have a machine configured similarly to your's, so this ought to not be too difficult to fix... I hope. :-)