From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759973AbYEGBuq (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2008 21:50:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750990AbYEGBuf (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2008 21:50:35 -0400 Received: from saraswathi.solana.com ([198.99.130.12]:44073 "EHLO saraswathi.solana.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750963AbYEGBue (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2008 21:50:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 21:48:57 -0400 From: Jeff Dike To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Ulrich Drepper , Linux Kernel Mailing List , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix UML on x86-64 Message-ID: <20080507014857.GB14912@c2.user-mode-linux.org> References: <200805062304.m46N4h6d007206@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <4820EC0E.1030603@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 05:06:40PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Some UML person should really take a look. It might be a compiler bug that > is triggered by -fno-unit-at-a-time, but considering that x86 is the most > tested architecture by far and apparently does *not* hit that problem, it > sounds more likely that it's UML-related and the compiler just triggers a > bug in UML. > > Anybody? I think that's likely true. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com