From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757948AbYEGMQx (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2008 08:16:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754237AbYEGMQo (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2008 08:16:44 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:60184 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753990AbYEGMQn (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2008 08:16:43 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Freezer: Introduce PF_FREEZER_NOSIG Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 14:16:47 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) Cc: pm list , Ingo Molnar , Len Brown , LKML , Matt Helsley , Cedric Le Goater , Paul Menage , Andrew Morton , Alan Stern References: <200805070003.56387.rjw@sisk.pl> <200805070005.20403.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080507093621.GF13858@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20080507093621.GF13858@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200805071416.48180.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, 7 of May 2008, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! Hi, > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > The freezer currently attempts to distinguish kernel threads from > > user space tasks by checking if their mm pointer is unset and it > > does not send fake signals to kernel threads. However, there are > > kernel threads, mostly related to networking, that behave like > > user space tasks and may want to be sent a fake signal to be frozen. > > > > Introduce the new process flag PF_FREEZER_NOSIG that will be set > > by default for all kernel threads and make the freezer only send > > fake signals to the tasks having PF_FREEZER_NOSIG unset. Provide > > the set_freezable_with_signal() function to be called by the kernel > > threads that want to be sent a fake signal for freezing. > > > > This patch should not change the freezer's observable behavior. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > > ACK. Thanks! > > -static int has_mm(struct task_struct *p) > > +static inline bool should_send_signal(struct task_struct *p) > > { > > - return (p->mm && !(p->flags & PF_BORROWED_MM)); > > + return !(current->flags & PF_FREEZER_NOSIG); > > } > > > > Note that we used to tell kernel threads by ->mm, and now you assume > that anything created by ktrheadd is kernel thread, ->mm or not. > > I'm not sure if those can differ (->mm = NULL somewhere? Or ->mm = > something somewhere else?). It's done in analogy with PF_NOFREEZE, ie. everything that has set PF_NOFREEZE by default also has PF_FREEZER_NOSIG set by default, so I really don't expect any problems here. > I guess this should go to -mm for a long test... Yes, it should. Thanks, Rafael