From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758686AbYEIOrz (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 May 2008 10:47:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751909AbYEIOrp (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 May 2008 10:47:45 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:36569 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751457AbYEIOro (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 May 2008 10:47:44 -0400 Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 16:47:22 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: James Bottomley Cc: WANG Cong , toralf.foerster@gmx.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Mike Travis , Alexey Starikovskiy Subject: Re: build issue #380 for v2.6.26-rc1-279-g28a4acb : mach-voyager: multiple definition of `phys_cpu_present_map' Message-ID: <20080509144722.GA20566@elte.hu> References: <200805091114.00244.toralf.foerster@gmx.de> <20080509095244.GJ2543@hacking> <20080509095837.GB19617@elte.hu> <1210342946.3069.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1210342946.3069.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * James Bottomley wrote: > > > /* Bitmask of CPUs present in the system - exported by i386_syms.c, used > > > * by scheduler but indexed physically */ > > > -cpumask_t phys_cpu_present_map = CPU_MASK_NONE; > > > +static cpumask_t phys_cpu_present_map = CPU_MASK_NONE; > > > > i've got the one below queued up but it's stalled as it could easily be > > wrong and there's no ack from James yet and there's been discussion back > > and forth. James, what do you suggest? > I already told you that this was incorrect. This is what I sent as > the replacement on 28 April and I didn't hear back from you. > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120941111400620 ok - picked it up for testing - could you please send a signoff line as well? Alexey, you moved those SMP variables, do you agree with the patch from James? (it looks good to me) Ingo