From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756755AbYEKN6P (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 May 2008 09:58:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752886AbYEKN57 (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 May 2008 09:57:59 -0400 Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.171.30]:37689 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751938AbYEKN56 (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 May 2008 09:57:58 -0400 Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 08:57:57 -0500 From: Paul Jackson To: Alexander van Heukelum Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, heukelum@fastmail.fm, travis@sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make for_each_cpu_mask a bit smaller Message-Id: <20080511085757.b68c1a48.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20080511135039.GA3286@mailshack.com> References: <20080511135039.GA3286@mailshack.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.12.0; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexander wrote: > Each use of the for_each_cpu_mask > constuct then becomes a few bytes smaller. Looks good, at first glance. Could you include Mike Travis on the CC list for this work? He's been having fun lately with cpumasks. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.940.382.4214