From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759588AbYEMKsT (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2008 06:48:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750963AbYEMKsL (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2008 06:48:11 -0400 Received: from server.drzeus.cx ([85.8.24.28]:49312 "EHLO smtp.drzeus.cx" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750810AbYEMKsJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2008 06:48:09 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 12:47:45 +0200 From: Pierre Ossman To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Steven French , Steven Whitehouse , Stefan Richter , Jeff Garzik , Ralf Baechle , Jan Kara , Anton Vorontsov , Jens Axboe , Eric Van Hensbergen , Wim Van Sebroeck , Christian Zankel , Nicolas Pitre , Pekka Enberg , Christoph Lameter , Erez Zadok , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next Message-ID: <20080513124745.24158a93@mjolnir.drzeus.cx> In-Reply-To: <20080513170052.eacecb02.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20080502151206.b40f77ea.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080513083615.4e463f87@mjolnir.drzeus.cx> <20080513170052.eacecb02.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 13 May 2008 17:00:52 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > On Tue, 13 May 2008 08:36:15 +0200 Pierre Ossman wrote: > > > > The stuff I've pushed to Andrew has always been what I've been hoping > > to merge in the next window, so it should just be a matter of renaming > > the branch. There is a #next at the above URI now. > > I have added that for tomorrow, thanks. > > I noticed that that tree also has a for-linus branch. Would that be bug > fixes and stuff lined up for this release i.e. 2.6.26? If so, I could > add that to linux-next as well as one of the early merge trees. > That's correct. But I've always made sure that for-linus is the base for for-andrew (now next), so that should not be necessary. -- -- Pierre Ossman Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org