From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757521AbYENEZy (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 00:25:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751363AbYENEZr (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 00:25:47 -0400 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:36147 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751192AbYENEZr (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 00:25:47 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 06:25:44 +0200 From: Nick Piggin To: kniht@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Memory Management List , linuxppc-dev , Paul Mackerras , Nishanth Aravamudan , Andi Kleen , Adam Litke Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] 16G and multi size hugetlb page support on powerpc Message-ID: <20080514042544.GA23578@wotan.suse.de> References: <4829CAC3.30900@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4829CAC3.30900@us.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:07:15PM -0500, Jon Tollefson wrote: > This patch set builds on Nick Piggin's patches for multi size and giant > hugetlb page support of April 22. The following set of patches adds > support for 16G huge pages on ppc64 and support for multiple huge page > sizes at the same time on ppc64. Thus allowing 64K, 16M, and 16G huge > pages given a POWER5+ or later machine. > > New to this version of my patch is numerous bug fixes and cleanups, but > the biggest change is the support for multiple huge page sizes on power. > > patch 1: changes to generic hugetlb to enable 16G pages on power > patch 2: powerpc: adds function for allocating 16G pages > patch 3: powerpc: setups 16G page locations found in device tree > patch 4: powerpc: page definition support for 16G pages > patch 5: check for overflow when user space is 32bit > patch 6: powerpc: multiple huge page size support Hi Jon, Thanks very much. I'll put these at the end of my patchset and attempt to keep them building if I make changes to the core code (have to spend a bit of time catching up with the review comments from last round). I'll send out another patchset for review in a day or so after I catch up, and then hopefully get it merged in -mm for 2.6.27. Thanks, Nick