From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
To: macro@linux-mips.org
Cc: a.zummo@towertech.it, hvr@gnu.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RTC: M41T80: Century Bit support
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 01:10:34 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080519.011034.25909336.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0805171959030.10067@cliff.in.clinika.pl>
On Sat, 17 May 2008 20:16:20 +0100 (BST), "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> wrote:
> > How about doing like this?
> >
> > 1. If CEB was 0, keep current behavior. (does not touch CB bit)
> >
> > 2. If CEB was 1, detect polarity of CB bit on get_datetime, and set or
> > clear CB bit on set_datetime based on the polarity.
>
> That's what I did initially as it is as obvious as you can get. But as I
> noted, CFE, the firmware used with the SWARM, does not set CEB even though
> it takes CB into account. The approach is not useful therefore at least
> for one major user of the device.
Oh I had missed that the firmware does not set CEB. Hmm...
> Of course CFE is BSD-licensed and can be changed too, but based on my
> experience with how serious bugs are handled, I would not count on getting
> such a minor change integrated into the official sources.
>
> > Please look at "c_polarity" variable in rtc-pcf8563.c driver.
>
> Hmm, not terribly useful as few of us if anybody live back in the 20th
> century. ;-) I think let's scrap the patch in this case and let our
> grandchildren solve the problem -- a proposal has been published and can
> be reused as needed.
OK for me. Lets hear how our grandchildren complain on this fault. :)
---
Atsushi Nemoto
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-18 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-17 0:25 Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-05-17 15:02 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2008-05-17 19:16 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-05-18 16:10 ` Atsushi Nemoto [this message]
2008-05-20 19:51 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-05-20 20:03 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-20 20:30 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-05-21 0:56 ` Atsushi Nemoto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080519.011034.25909336.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp \
--to=anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hvr@gnu.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®