From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make LIST_POISON less deadly
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 15:01:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080519130151.GE13546@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1211125094-32167-1-git-send-email-avi@qumranet.com>
* Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com> wrote:
> The list macros use LIST_POISON1 and LIST_POISON2 as undereferencable
> pointers in order to trap erronous use of freed list_heads.
> Unfortunately userspace can arrange for those pointers to actually be
> dereferencable, potentially turning an oops to an expolit.
>
> To avoid this allow architectures (currently x86_64 only) to override
> the default values for these pointers with truly-undereferncable
> values. This is easy on x86_64 as the virtual address space is smaller
> than the range spanned by pointer values.
nice idea!
i'd suggest a slightly different solution:
> +/*
> + * Define LIST_POISON[12] as pointers that cannot be dereferenced.
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_84
> +# undef LIST_POISON1
> +# undef LIST_POISON2
> +# define LIST_POISON1 ((void *)0x8001000100010001L)
> +# define LIST_POISON2 ((void *)0x8002000200020002L)
> +#endif
i'd suggest to add an ARCH_ILLEGAL_POINTER define instead, which
defaults to zero and gets added to pointer-ish poison values. That makes
it both simpler and also it does not need any include/asm changes
because ARCH_ILLEGAL_POINTER can be set from the Kconfig space.
hm?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-19 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-18 15:38 Avi Kivity
2008-05-19 13:01 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-05-19 13:18 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-19 13:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-19 13:35 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-19 13:45 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-19 19:04 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-20 7:06 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-20 11:24 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-20 11:34 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-20 11:49 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-20 11:52 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-20 12:04 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-20 12:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-20 16:47 ` Pavel Machek
2008-05-20 16:50 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080519130151.GE13546@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®