From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764171AbYESX1U (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2008 19:27:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754689AbYESX1E (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2008 19:27:04 -0400 Received: from g1t0027.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.34]:12537 "EHLO g1t0027.austin.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754741AbYESX1D (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2008 19:27:03 -0400 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Rene Herman Subject: Re: [patch 3/8] PNP: remove pnp_resource.index Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 17:27:00 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) Cc: Len Brown , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Adam Belay , Adam M Belay , Li Shaohua , Matthieu Castet , Thomas Renninger , Jaroslav Kysela , Andrew Morton References: <20080505223630.682082986@ldl.fc.hp.com> <20080505223959.374741576@ldl.fc.hp.com> <4831F8BC.3080405@keyaccess.nl> In-Reply-To: <4831F8BC.3080405@keyaccess.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200805191727.01487.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 19 May 2008 04:01:32 pm Rene Herman wrote: > On 06-05-08 00:36, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > We used pnp_resource.index to keep track of which ISAPNP configuration > > register a resource should be written to. We needed this only to > > handle the case where a register is disabled but a subsequent register > > in the same set is enabled. > > > > Rather than explicitly maintaining the pnp_resource.index, this patch > > adds a resource every time we read an ISAPNP configuration register > > and marks the resource as IORESOURCE_DISABLED when appropriate. This > > makes the position in the pnp_resource_table always correspond to the > > config register index. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas > > > - pnp_res = pnp_add_io_resource(dev, start, end, > > - 0); > > - if (pnp_res) > > - pnp_res->index = nport++; > > + pnp_add_io_resource(dev, start, end, 0); > > In the tree after your v2 series, pnp_add_foo_resource() are called as > void functions yet still return a struct pnp_resource *. You might have > other plans but if not, I guess they can _be_ void functions? You're right, I still don't do anything with the return value. It could be used to check for success/failure, but we currently don't do that. Possibly a future cleanup since there's no functional problem here. Bjorn