From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934360AbYETWUJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2008 18:20:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761333AbYETWT5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2008 18:19:57 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:43694 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760090AbYETWT5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2008 18:19:57 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 15:19:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20080520.151951.239145609.davem@davemloft.net> To: harvey.harrison@gmail.com Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] byteorder: eliminate pointer bytorder api From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1211321725.5915.208.camel@brick> References: <1211311449.5915.195.camel@brick> <20080520.141731.99514303.davem@davemloft.net> <1211321725.5915.208.camel@brick> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Harvey Harrison Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 15:15:25 -0700 > Obviously I missed that part, my apologies. Would it be acceptable if, > taking the possibly arch-specific parts, moved the [endian]_to_cpup > name over to get_[endian] Why are we fiddling with interface names that have been fine for about 10 years?