mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] build kernel/profile.o only when requested
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 13:21:50 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080520102150.GJ17716@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080520020121.c443d562.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 02:01:21AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2008 00:53:06 +0300 Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Build kernel/profile.o only if CONFIG_PROFILING is enabled.
> > 
> > This makes CONFIG_PROFILING=n kernels smaller.
> > 
> > As a bonus, some profile_tick() calls and one branch from schedule() are 
> > now eliminated with CONFIG_PROFILING=n (but I doubt these are
> > measurable effects).
> > 
> > This patch changes the effects of CONFIG_PROFILING=n, but I don't think 
> > having more than two choices would be the better choice.
> > 
> > This patch also adds the name of the first parameter to the prototypes 
> > of profile_{hits,tick}() since I anyway had to add them for the dummy 
> > functions.
> > 
> 
> Little nits:
> 
> > index 05c1cc7..4081fa3 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/profile.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/profile.h
> > @@ -8,8 +8,6 @@
> >  
> >  #include <asm/errno.h>
> >  
> > -extern int prof_on __read_mostly;
> > -
> >  #define CPU_PROFILING	1
> >  #define SCHED_PROFILING	2
> >  #define SLEEP_PROFILING	3
> > @@ -19,14 +17,29 @@ struct proc_dir_entry;
> >  struct pt_regs;
> >  struct notifier_block;
> >  
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_PROFILING) && defined(CONFIG_PROC_FS)
> > +void create_prof_cpu_mask(struct proc_dir_entry *);
> 
> This omits the argument's name, whereas elsewhere you have taken care
> to introduce the name where it was missing.
> 
> > +#else
> > +#define create_prof_cpu_mask(x)			do { (void)(x); } while (0)
> 
> I think this could be a static inline, which is neater.
>...

In these two cases I only moved code.

And I actually moved the other code and git just decided to move the 
code that stayed instead since it creates less changed lines...

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-20 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-19 21:53 Adrian Bunk
2008-05-20  9:01 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-20 10:21   ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2008-05-20 10:34     ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-20 10:42       ` Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080520102150.GJ17716@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi \
    --to=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®