From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
To: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sdietrich@novell.com,
pmorreale@novell.com, mkohari@novell.com, ghaskins@novell.com
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] remove the extra call to try_to_take_lock
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 10:49:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080520144936.15992.48894.stgit@novell1.haskins.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080520143954.15992.85900.stgit@novell1.haskins.net>
From: Peter W. Morreale <pmorreale@novell.com>
Remove the redundant attempt to get the lock. While it is true that the
exit path with this patch adds an un-necessary xchg (in the event the
lock is granted without further traversal in the loop) experimentation
shows that we almost never encounter this situation.
Signed-off-by: Peter W. Morreale <pmorreale@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
---
kernel/rtmutex.c | 6 ------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rtmutex.c b/kernel/rtmutex.c
index ec1f7d4..1da7813 100644
--- a/kernel/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/rtmutex.c
@@ -785,12 +785,6 @@ rt_spin_lock_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
init_lists(lock);
- /* Try to acquire the lock again: */
- if (do_try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, STEAL_LATERAL)) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
- return;
- }
-
BUG_ON(rt_mutex_owner(lock) == current);
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-20 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-20 14:49 [PATCH 0/5] RT: adaptive-lock enhancements Gregory Haskins
2008-05-20 14:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] optimize rt lock wakeup Gregory Haskins
2008-05-20 14:49 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched: make task->oncpu available in all configurations Gregory Haskins
2008-05-20 14:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] rtmutex: use task->oncpu to save a call Gregory Haskins
2008-05-20 14:49 ` [PATCH 4/5] adjust pi_lock usage in wakeup Gregory Haskins
2008-05-20 14:49 ` Gregory Haskins [this message]
2008-05-24 3:02 ` [PATCH 5/5] remove the extra call to try_to_take_lock Steven Rostedt
2008-05-24 3:30 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-05-24 14:11 ` Peter W. Morreale
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080520144936.15992.48894.stgit@novell1.haskins.net \
--to=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mkohari@novell.com \
--cc=pmorreale@novell.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sdietrich@novell.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®