From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934546AbYETP4W (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2008 11:56:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756468AbYETP4N (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2008 11:56:13 -0400 Received: from sous-sol.org ([216.99.217.87]:50831 "EHLO sous-sol.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755959AbYETP4M (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2008 11:56:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 08:55:57 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: Stephen Smalley Cc: Chris Wright , Adrian Bunk , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morris Subject: Re: LSM: MAINTAINERS points to no longer existing URL Message-ID: <20080520155557.GN30402@sequoia.sous-sol.org> References: <20080519214201.GB17716@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <20080519215843.GJ30402@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <1211286579.7486.75.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1211286579.7486.75.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Stephen Smalley (sds@tycho.nsa.gov) wrote: > On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 14:58 -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > > * Adrian Bunk (bunk@kernel.org) wrote: > > > MAINTAINERS says: > > > > > > LINUX SECURITY MODULE (LSM) FRAMEWORK > > > P: Chris Wright > > > M: chrisw@sous-sol.org > > > L: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org > > > W: http://lsm.immunix.org > > > T: git kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chrisw/lsm-2.6.git > > > S: Supported > > > > > > But http://lsm.immunix.org no longer exists. > > > > Indeed, queueing this. > > What about the git tree listed above? Is it still being maintained? > James Morris set up a security-testing git tree that was used e.g. for > the audit conversion from direct selinux calls to using LSM hooks and > for the security= boot parameter (i.e. for changes that went beyond just > one LSM). Yeah, I updated it last night to add this patch, a couple of other trivial patches (Lindent-type) that were sent to me, and I would put the proc ptrace one there as well, since it's touching core/smack/etc... That needs coordination w/ any follow-on. thanks, -chris