From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763269AbYEUJGD (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2008 05:06:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753765AbYEUJFw (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2008 05:05:52 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:60015 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750983AbYEUJFv (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2008 05:05:51 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 11:05:39 +0200 From: Karel Zak To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, util-linux-ng@vger.kernel.org, Mark.Seger@hp.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] util-linux-ng 2.14-rc3 Message-ID: <20080521090539.GK17439@nb.net.home> References: <20080519112402.GF17439@nb.net.home> <20080520191704.ea856364.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080520191704.ea856364.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 07:17:04PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Have you considered adding collectl to util-linux? If so, what was the > outcome? The util-linux is a very basic system package and I'd like to avoid dependences on things like Perl. I don't see a problem to distribute collectl as a separate package. It seems that Mark is maintaining the package very successfully on sf.net. Karel -- Karel Zak