From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756495AbYEVRmA (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2008 13:42:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753938AbYEVRlu (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2008 13:41:50 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:52066 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753476AbYEVRlu (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2008 13:41:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 10:41:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20080522.104145.193700531.davem@davemloft.net> To: jesper@krogh.cc Cc: Matheos.Worku@Sun.COM, yhlu.kernel@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NIU - Sun Neptune 10g - Transmit timed out reset (2.6.24) From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <4835A007.7020601@krogh.cc> References: <4824D1E1.10007@sun.com> <20080509.154538.28321777.davem@davemloft.net> <4835A007.7020601@krogh.cc> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jesper Krogh Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 18:32:07 +0200 > Does this mean that I can expect every 10G card to have this limitation > under Linux? For now, yes. The transmit path itself in the generic network device layer is where the serialization comes from. I'm travelling now for 3 weeks so I won't be able to work on this stuff until I get back.