From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Amit K. Arora" <aarora@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 2/3] Make calls to account_scaled_stats
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 20:01:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080526143146.24680.36724.stgit@drishya.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080526142513.24680.97164.stgit@drishya.in.ibm.com>
Hook various accounting functions to call scaled stats
* Hook porcess contect switch: __switch_to()
* Hook IRQ handling account_system_vtime() in hardirq.hA
* Update __delayacct_add_tsk() to take care of scaling by 1000
* Update bacct_add_tsk() to take care of scaling by 1000
Signed-off-by: Amit K. Arora <aarora@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 8 ++++++++
include/linux/hardirq.h | 4 ++++
kernel/delayacct.c | 7 ++++++-
kernel/timer.c | 2 --
kernel/tsacct.c | 10 ++++++++--
5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
index f8476df..c81a783 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
@@ -56,6 +56,9 @@
#include <asm/cpu.h>
#include <asm/kdebug.h>
+extern void account_scaled_stats(struct task_struct *tsk);
+extern void reset_for_scaled_stats(struct task_struct *tsk);
+
asmlinkage void ret_from_fork(void) __asm__("ret_from_fork");
static int hlt_counter;
@@ -660,6 +663,11 @@ struct task_struct * __switch_to(struct task_struct *prev_p, struct task_struct
loadsegment(gs, next->gs);
x86_write_percpu(current_task, next_p);
+ /* Account scaled statistics for the task leaving CPU */
+ account_scaled_stats(prev_p);
+ barrier();
+ /* Initialise stats counter for new task */
+ reset_for_scaled_stats(next_p);
return prev_p;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/hardirq.h b/include/linux/hardirq.h
index 181006c..4458736 100644
--- a/include/linux/hardirq.h
+++ b/include/linux/hardirq.h
@@ -7,6 +7,9 @@
#include <asm/hardirq.h>
#include <asm/system.h>
+/* TBD: Add config option */
+extern void account_scaled_stats(struct task_struct *tsk);
+
/*
* We put the hardirq and softirq counter into the preemption
* counter. The bitmask has the following meaning:
@@ -115,6 +118,7 @@ struct task_struct;
#ifndef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING
static inline void account_system_vtime(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
+ account_scaled_stats(tsk);
}
#endif
diff --git a/kernel/delayacct.c b/kernel/delayacct.c
index 10e43fd..3e2938f 100644
--- a/kernel/delayacct.c
+++ b/kernel/delayacct.c
@@ -117,7 +117,12 @@ int __delayacct_add_tsk(struct taskstats *d, struct task_struct *tsk)
tmp = (s64)d->cpu_scaled_run_real_total;
cputime_to_timespec(tsk->utimescaled + tsk->stimescaled, &ts);
- tmp += timespec_to_ns(&ts);
+ /* HACK: Remember, we multipled the cputime_t by 1000 to include
+ * fraction. Now it is time to scale it back to correct 'ns' value.
+ * Perhaps, we should use nano second unit (u64 type) for utimescaled
+ * and stimescaled?
+ */
+ tmp += div_s64(timespec_to_ns(&ts),1000);
d->cpu_scaled_run_real_total =
(tmp < (s64)d->cpu_scaled_run_real_total) ? 0 : tmp;
diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c
index ceacc66..de8a615 100644
--- a/kernel/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/timer.c
@@ -964,10 +964,8 @@ void account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick)
if (user_tick) {
account_user_time(p, one_jiffy);
- account_user_time_scaled(p, cputime_to_scaled(one_jiffy));
} else {
account_system_time(p, HARDIRQ_OFFSET, one_jiffy);
- account_system_time_scaled(p, cputime_to_scaled(one_jiffy));
}
}
#endif
diff --git a/kernel/tsacct.c b/kernel/tsacct.c
index 4ab1b58..ee0d93b 100644
--- a/kernel/tsacct.c
+++ b/kernel/tsacct.c
@@ -62,10 +62,16 @@ void bacct_add_tsk(struct taskstats *stats, struct task_struct *tsk)
rcu_read_unlock();
stats->ac_utime = cputime_to_msecs(tsk->utime) * USEC_PER_MSEC;
stats->ac_stime = cputime_to_msecs(tsk->stime) * USEC_PER_MSEC;
+ /* HACK: cputime unit is jiffies on x86 and not good for fractional
+ * additional. cputime_t type {u,s}timescaled is multiplied by
+ * 1000 for scaled accounting. Hence, cputime_to_msecs will actually
+ * give the required micro second value. The multiplier
+ * USEC_PER_MSEC has been dropped.
+ */
stats->ac_utimescaled =
- cputime_to_msecs(tsk->utimescaled) * USEC_PER_MSEC;
+ cputime_to_msecs(tsk->utimescaled);
stats->ac_stimescaled =
- cputime_to_msecs(tsk->stimescaled) * USEC_PER_MSEC;
+ cputime_to_msecs(tsk->stimescaled);
stats->ac_minflt = tsk->min_flt;
stats->ac_majflt = tsk->maj_flt;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-26 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-26 14:31 [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] Scaled statistics using APERF/MPERF in x86 Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-26 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] General framework for APERF/MPERF access and accounting Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-26 18:11 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-27 14:54 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-26 14:31 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [this message]
2008-05-26 18:18 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/3] Make calls to account_scaled_stats Balbir Singh
2008-05-27 15:02 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-29 15:18 ` Michael Neuling
2008-05-29 18:23 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-26 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/3] Print scaled utime and stime in getdelays Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-26 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] Scaled statistics using APERF/MPERF in x86 Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-26 17:24 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-26 18:00 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-26 18:36 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-26 18:51 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-27 12:59 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-27 13:19 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-27 14:15 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-27 15:27 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-31 21:27 ` Pavel Machek
2008-06-02 17:54 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-06-03 2:20 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-27 13:29 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-27 14:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-27 15:20 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-27 14:04 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-27 16:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-27 18:26 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-31 21:17 ` Pavel Machek
2008-05-31 21:13 ` Pavel Machek
2008-06-02 6:08 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080526143146.24680.36724.stgit@drishya.in.ibm.com \
--to=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aarora@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®