From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754918AbYE2Eki (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 00:40:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751383AbYE2Ek3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 00:40:29 -0400 Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.171.30]:59635 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750709AbYE2Ek3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 00:40:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 23:40:25 -0500 From: Paul Jackson To: Max Krasnyansky Cc: mingo@elte.hu, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, menage@google.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, maxk@qualcomm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] [sched] Move cpu masks from kernel/sched.c into kernel/cpu.c Message-Id: <20080528234025.621bce6a.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <1211926006-11559-1-git-send-email-maxk@qualcomm.com> References: <1211926006-11559-1-git-send-email-maxk@qualcomm.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.12.0; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Max, Does this patch mean that some 2K to 3K bytes of kernel text will be added to non-SMP systems, due to kernel/cpu.o moving from CONFIG_SMP only to always being included? If so, then I'd think that the folks who obsess with small non-SMP kernels might not like this change. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.940.382.4214