From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Eugene_Bordenkircher@selinc.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: BUG/OOPS: Double Lock in fsl_usb2_udc.c
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 01:45:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080529014535.6065fa39.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF581BDA23.991E51FC-ON88257457.007166AD-88257457.007B3064@selinc.com>
On Wed, 28 May 2008 15:25:31 -0700 Eugene_Bordenkircher@selinc.com wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have recently found an instance in the drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_usb2_udc.c
> file that causes the udc->lock spinlock to be taken twice. The problem
> arises when you disconnect from the DR port and then reconnect. The
> interrupt routine for the driver receives a 'reset' event which takes the
> lock and calls reset_queues() which in turn calls
> udc->driver->disconnect(). Eventually, that disconnect() call comes back
> up to the fsl_usb2_udc driver and calls fsl_ep_disable() which attempts to
> take the udc->lock again. Unfortunately the lock was not released before
> the call to disconnect(), therefore the double lock is taken.
>
> Looking through other drivers, I have seen them releasing the lock
> immediately before calling disconnect(), however, without being an expert
> with this driver, I'm not entirely sure that is the best option here.
>
> I have seen the behavior directly on a 2.6.23.9-rt13 kernel, but have
> perused the latest source and the same problem appears to be there.
> Attached below is the generated BUG trace for the 2.6.23.9-rt13 kernel.
>
> Please CC me directly if possible for immediate responses. Otherwise I
> will have to wait for the archives to post to read responses.
>
> Eugene T. Bordenkircher
>
> ---Begin BUG:
>
> kernel BUG at kernel/rtmutex.c:683!
> stopped custom tracer.
> Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#1]
> PREEMPT MPC834x ITX
> NIP: c021629c LR: c0216270 CTR: 00000000
> REGS: df761d70 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (2.6.23.9-rt13)
> MSR: 00021032 <ME,IR,DR> CR: 28000022 XER: 00000000
> TASK = df632080[241] 'IRQ-38' THREAD: df760000
> GPR00: 00000001 df761e20 df632080 00000000 11111111 00000000 df761e6c
> 00000000
> GPR08: df761e48 00000000 df761e50 00000000 80000000 ede5cdde 1fffd000
> 00800000
> GPR16: ffffffff 00000000 007fff00 00000040 00000000 007ffeb0 00000000
> 1fff8b08
> GPR24: 00000000 00000026 00000000 df79a320 c026b2e8 c02240bc 00009032
> df79a320
> NIP [c021629c] rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x9c/0x200
> LR [c0216270] rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x70/0x200
> Call Trace:
> [df761e20] [c0216270] rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x70/0x200 (unreliable)
> [df761e90] [c0182828] fsl_ep_disable+0xcc/0x154
> [df761eb0] [c0184d30] eth_reset_config+0x88/0x1d0
> [df761ed0] [c0184ec0] eth_disconnect+0x48/0x64
> [df761ef0] [c01831a4] reset_queues+0x60/0x78
> [df761f00] [c0183b74] fsl_udc_irq+0x9b8/0xa58
> [df761f50] [c003ef30] handle_IRQ_event+0x64/0x100
> [df761f80] [c003f758] thread_simple_irq+0x6c/0xc8
> [df761fa0] [c003f888] do_irqd+0xd4/0x2e4
> [df761fd0] [c0032284] kthread+0x50/0x8c
> [df761ff0] [c000f9b4] kernel_thread+0x44/0x60
> Instruction dump:
> 4be25fb9 2f830000 41be0014 7fe3fb78 7fc4f378 48000f69 48000168 801f0024
> 5400003a 7c001278 21600000 7c0b0114 <0f000000> 38000004 90010008 80010008
> note: IRQ-38[241] exited with preempt_count 1
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context IRQ-38(241) at
> kernel/rtmutex.c:637
> in_atomic():1 [00000001], irqs_disabled():0
> Call Trace:
> [df761c20] [c0008674] show_stack+0x54/0x174 (unreliable)
> [df761c50] [c0014e74] __might_sleep+0xe0/0xf4
> [df761c60] [c02169f8] __lock_text_start+0x30/0x48
> [df761c70] [c001e928] do_exit+0x1f8/0x7bc
> [df761ca0] [c000d0bc] die+0x198/0x1b0
> [df761cc0] [c000d26c] _exception+0x38/0xf8
> [df761d60] [c000f1bc] ret_from_except_full+0x0/0x4c
> --- Exception: 700 at rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x9c/0x200
> LR = rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x70/0x200
> [df761e90] [c0182828] fsl_ep_disable+0xcc/0x154
> [df761eb0] [c0184d30] eth_reset_config+0x88/0x1d0
> [df761ed0] [c0184ec0] eth_disconnect+0x48/0x64
> [df761ef0] [c01831a4] reset_queues+0x60/0x78
> [df761f00] [c0183b74] fsl_udc_irq+0x9b8/0xa58
> [df761f50] [c003ef30] handle_IRQ_event+0x64/0x100
> [df761f80] [c003f758] thread_simple_irq+0x6c/0xc8
> [df761fa0] [c003f888] do_irqd+0xd4/0x2e4
> [df761fd0] [c0032284] kthread+0x50/0x8c
> [df761ff0] [c000f9b4] kernel_thread+0x44/0x60
>
Thanks, useful.
Let's cc some folks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-29 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-28 22:25 Eugene_Bordenkircher
2008-05-29 8:45 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-05-29 9:23 ` David Brownell
2008-05-29 10:48 ` Li Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080529014535.6065fa39.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Eugene_Bordenkircher@selinc.com \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=leoli@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®