From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757055AbYE3EiT (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2008 00:38:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753313AbYE3Ehc (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2008 00:37:32 -0400 Received: from smtp118.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.91]:46627 "HELO smtp118.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753056AbYE3Ehb (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2008 00:37:31 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Disposition:Message-Id:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=lXmcfNv93/AhgaLUM4RDL0m+pExCfiKa6ATCXlOlXW+DchC699cSQGvt4S9PDb9aEP/oNWnCk7oPb99ah+jn/3sX21uB04t5f2hQOyo4t9fLAPhEkVsC0nUS5IBXl7VY+ouEYivbvWE+LeMZy/3NqdV7yiWBNhBm/j7kTjJKNeY= ; X-YMail-OSG: iGeutsAVM1nyD094vUdt4c77th5RhsSMi2l_3w7kakJ.w7grNzFK9Xf7KGJFmq813tTy.sTrL6Kyo5CUUd6T8.lrLw79wymOlzBDPvblCCfxYyZQdFMcoOTr2f4VI1BGTOQ- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: David Brownell To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.26-rc4-git] PM: boot time suspend selftest Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 21:34:19 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, pavel@suse.cz References: <200805291333.42057.david-b@pacbell.net> <200805292329.48896.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080529160632.816e1720.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080529160632.816e1720.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200805292134.19388.david-b@pacbell.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 29 May 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Could you check, please?  The previous version didn't. > > > > There's just one trivial reject against the PCI tree's > pm-introduce-new-top-level-suspend-and-hibernation-callbacks: Thanks Andrew ... in that case I'm not going to worry about any "-next" issues for now. - Dave > *************** > *** 293,299 **** >         if (suspend_ops->finish) >                 suspend_ops->finish(); >    Resume_devices: >         device_resume(); >    Resume_console: >         resume_console(); >    Close: > --- 342,350 ---- >         if (suspend_ops->finish) >                 suspend_ops->finish(); >    Resume_devices: > +       suspend_test_start(); >         device_resume(); > +       suspend_test_finish("resume devices"); >    Resume_console: >         resume_console(); >    Close: