From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757217AbYE3EZe (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2008 00:25:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751863AbYE3EZ0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2008 00:25:26 -0400 Received: from agminet01.oracle.com ([141.146.126.228]:10617 "EHLO agminet01.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751224AbYE3EZZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2008 00:25:25 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 21:38:45 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap To: Andrew Morton Cc: "Fabio Comolli" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , sam@ravnborg.org Subject: Re: Section mismatch on latest git Message-Id: <20080529213845.d013a65e.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <20080529000128.a106a7b1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080529000128.a106a7b1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Organization: Oracle Linux Eng. X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.0; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 29 May 2008 00:01:28 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 26 May 2008 10:03:21 +0200 "Fabio Comolli" wrote: > > > Hi. > > I don't know it it has been reported already: > > > > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x114bb): Section mismatch in reference from > > the function nopat() to the function .cpuinit.text:pat_disable() > > The function nopat() references > > the function __cpuinit pat_disable(). > > This is often because nopat lacks a __cpuinit > > annotation or the annotation of pat_disable is wrong. > > > > Config is in attachment. > > > > This should fix it: > > --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c~arch-x86-mm-patc-nopat-should-be-__init > +++ a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ void __cpuinit pat_disable(char *reason) > printk(KERN_INFO "%s\n", reason); > } > > -static int nopat(char *str) > +static int __init nopat(char *str) > { > pat_disable("PAT support disabled."); > return 0; > _ > > > It turns out that this was harmless. However it might not have been - > I think that adding the ability to suppress all these warnings was a > mistake. It certainly has caused me to stop looking for/at them. More a sin of omission than one of commission. --- ~Randy "He closes his eyes and drops the goggles. You can't get hurt by looking at a bitmap. Or can you?"