From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756363AbYFAJVg (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2008 05:21:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752119AbYFAJV0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2008 05:21:26 -0400 Received: from pasmtpa.tele.dk ([80.160.77.114]:40295 "EHLO pasmtpA.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752035AbYFAJVZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2008 05:21:25 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 11:22:05 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Andrew Morton Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Jiri Kosina , Ingo Molnar , Linux/m68k , Linux Kernel Development Subject: Re: m68k libc5 regression Message-ID: <20080601092205.GA18045@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <20080601005338.3affe880.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080601014824.528173bb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080601014824.528173bb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 01:48:24AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 10:37:59 +0200 (CEST) Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > I shall merge this fix into my tree (y'know - the one where memory > > > management patches are hosted) and I'll get it into 2.6.26 and shall > > > offer it to the -stable team. This will cause me to get collisions > > > with the duplicated patch in linux-next but fortunately it is small. > > > This time. > > > > So what's the appropriate way to handle this? > > Well at least please reply letting people know what's happening with it. > > Ask me to merge it and remind me that it's needed in -stable. Or just > send the thing to Linus and -stable immediately. I recall adding: Cc: stable@kernel.org will automagically tell the stable team when this is merged and that it is a -stable candidate. Sam