From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756046AbYFAKeL (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2008 06:34:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752195AbYFAKd5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2008 06:33:57 -0400 Received: from pasmtpb.tele.dk ([80.160.77.98]:39280 "EHLO pasmtpB.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751714AbYFAKd5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2008 06:33:57 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 12:34:37 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Andrew Morton Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Jiri Kosina , Ingo Molnar , Linux/m68k , Linux Kernel Development Subject: Re: m68k libc5 regression Message-ID: <20080601103437.GA18798@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <20080601005338.3affe880.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080601014824.528173bb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080601092205.GA18045@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20080601024105.b350d1b7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080601024105.b350d1b7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 02:41:05AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 11:22:05 +0200 Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 01:48:24AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 10:37:59 +0200 (CEST) Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > > > > > I shall merge this fix into my tree (y'know - the one where memory > > > > > management patches are hosted) and I'll get it into 2.6.26 and shall > > > > > offer it to the -stable team. This will cause me to get collisions > > > > > with the duplicated patch in linux-next but fortunately it is small. > > > > > This time. > > > > > > > > So what's the appropriate way to handle this? > > > > > > Well at least please reply letting people know what's happening with it. > > > > > > Ask me to merge it and remind me that it's needed in -stable. Or just > > > send the thing to Linus and -stable immediately. > > > > I recall adding: > > Cc: stable@kernel.org > > > > will automagically tell the stable team when this is > > merged and that it is a -stable candidate. > > > > Yup. Except I always use the <> wrappers around the email address. In > fact my scripts require that (and probably shouldn't). We don't seem > very consistent with that. Email addresses are often verbatim copied from MAINTAINERS where we not yet have proper format (no <>). So relying on <> in Cc: is not good. For stable on 20 where without <> since 2.6.20 compered to 291 with <>. Sam