mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Tom Spink <tspink@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] vfs: Introduce on-demand filesystem initialisation
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 16:32:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080601153205.GM28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1212331915-22856-2-git-send-email-tspink@gmail.com>

On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 03:51:54PM +0100, Tom Spink wrote:


Occam's Razor...

You've just serialized ->kill_sb() for given fs type (and made sure that
if one gets stuck, _everything_ gets stuck).  Moreover, you've serialized
sget() against the same thing (i.e. pretty much each ->get_sb()).

All of that (and a couple of new methods) is done for something that just
plain does not belong to VFS.  It's trivially doable in filesystem *and*
it's about the objects with lifetimes that make sense only for filesystem
itself.

Hell, just do

int want_xfs_threads(void)
{
	int res = 0;
	mutex_lock(&foo_lock);
	if (!count++) {
		start threads
		if failed {
			count--;
			res = -Esomething;
		}
	}
	mutex_unlock(&foo_lock);
	return res;
}

void leave_xfs_threads(void)
{
	mutex_lock(&foo_lock);
	if (!--count)
		stop threads
	mutex_unlock(&foo_lock);
}

Call want_xfs_threads() in xfs_fs_fill_super(); call leave_xfs_threads() in
the end of xfs_put_super() and on failure exit from xfs_fs_fill_super().
End of story...  Any other fs that wants such things can do the same.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-01 15:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-01 14:51 [RFC PATCH 0/2] On-demand Filesystem Initialisation Tom Spink
2008-06-01 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] vfs: Introduce on-demand filesystem initialisation Tom Spink
2008-06-01 14:51   ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] xfs: Make XFS use the new file system init infrastructure Tom Spink
2008-06-01 15:32   ` Al Viro [this message]
2008-06-02 13:38     ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] vfs: Introduce on-demand filesystem initialisation Tom Spink
2008-06-02  1:58 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] On-demand Filesystem Initialisation Dave Chinner
2008-06-02 13:39   ` Tom Spink
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-25 17:48 Tom Spink
2008-05-25 17:48 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] vfs: Introduce on-demand filesystem initialisation Tom Spink

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080601153205.GM28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tspink@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome