--Boundary-00=_NG3SIU63+Zdv2JV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 06 June 2008, James Bottomley wrote: > On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 11:03 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 06 Jun 2008 10:22:22 -0500 James Bottomley=20 wrote: > > > On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 23:25 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 23:21:45 -0700 Andrew Morton=20 wrote: > > > > > > > > > not ready." Pretends not to have noticed.> > > > > > > > > It goes much better when the CD is inserted upside up. > > > > > > So I can close this regression if I send you a pack of CD ring labels > > > with "other way up" on them for you to affix to the underside of your > > > CDs ... ? > > > > Would prefer double-sided CDs. > > I just discovered my budget only runs to a permanent marker for you to > write the instructions on the rim yourself ... > > > Is this 20-second-delay thing known-about/expected/etc? > > If it's not the scsi_bus_uevent problem, then no, it isn't. > > The odd thing is that it occurs in the middle of USB initialisation from > Because of this oddity, I've also built 2.6.26-rc5-git2 with verbose USB debugging on. A boot log from that kernel is attached. You will see lots of ETIME errors from usb. A log from a similarly verbose 2.6.25.5 kernel does not show these errors. usb-devel added to cc list. > the log: > > =EF=BB=BFJun 6 17:25:19 upstairs kernel: uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: UHCI H= ost > > Controller Jun 6 17:25:19 upstairs kernel: uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: new > > USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1 Jun 6 17:25:19 upstairs > > kernel: uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: irq 16, io base 0x0000a800 Jun 6 17:25:= 19 > > upstairs kernel: usb usb1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice Jun 6 > > 17:25:19 upstairs kernel: hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found > > Jun 6 17:25:19 upstairs kernel: hub 1-0:1.0: 2 ports detected > > Jun 6 17:25:44 upstairs kernel: ohci_hcd: 2006 August 04 USB 1.1 'Open' > > Host Controller (OHCI) Driver Jun 6 17:25:44 upstairs kernel: usb usb1: > > New USB device found, idVendor=3D1d6b, idProduct=3D0001 Jun 6 17:25:44 > > upstairs kernel: usb usb1: New USB device strings: Mfr=3D3, Product=3D2, > > SerialNumber=3D1 Jun 6 17:25:44 upstairs kernel: usb usb1: Product: UH= CI > > Host Controller Jun 6 17:25:44 upstairs kernel: usb usb1: Manufacturer: > > Linux 2.6.26-rc5 uhci_hcd > > Note the jump from 19 to 44 seconds. > > There's another one here: > > =EF=BB=BFJun 6 17:25:44 upstairs kernel: EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem w= ith > > ordered data mode. Jun 6 17:25:44 upstairs kernel: Adding 4096532k swap > > on /dev/sda5. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:4096532k Jun 6 17:25:44 > > upstairs kernel: eth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x45E1 Jun 6 > > 17:25:44 upstairs kernel: ip_tables: (C) 2000-2006 Netfilter Core Team > > Jun 6 17:25:44 upstairs kernel: nf_conntrack version 0.5.0 (16384 > > buckets, 65536 max) Jun 6 17:25:44 upstairs kernel: parport_pc 00:06: > > disabled > > Jun 6 17:25:44 upstairs kernel: pnp: the driver 'parport_pc' has been > > unregistered Jun 6 17:25:44 upstairs kernel: ieee1394: Node removed: > > ID:BUS[0-00:1023] GUID[00110666000013cc] Jun 6 17:26:31 upstairs > > kernel: usb 11-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 3 > > Jun 6 17:26:31 upstairs kernel: usb 11-2: configuration #1 chosen from= 1 > > choice Jun 6 17:26:31 upstairs kernel: usb 11-2: New USB device found, > > idVendor=3D0930, idProduct=3D6545 Jun 6 17:26:31 upstairs kernel: usb = 11-2: > > New USB device strings: Mfr=3D0, Product=3D2, SerialNumber=3D3 Jun 6 1= 7:26:31 > > upstairs kernel: usb 11-2: Product: USB Flash Memory Jun 6 17:26:31 > > upstairs kernel: usb 11-2: SerialNumber: 0EC065712361A91E > > I'm a bit baffled as to how that could be SCSI related, but I suppose it > could be udev related somehow. Perhaps turning on driver core debugging > might help (that's CONFIG_DEBUG DRIVER ... it depends on > CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL for activation). Hopefully the verbose kernel logs > from here might tell us what's going on in the lacunae. > Triggered by James' bafflement and for my own peace of mind, I've run another bisect session. This time I started with v2.6.26 as good and v2.6.26-rc2 as bad. It highlighted the same patch as the "culprit". Chris > James -- Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.