From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt 5/5] cpu-hotplug: cpu_down vs preempt-rt
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:33:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080610153301.GD15481@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080610111832.969119014@chello.nl>
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 01:13:04PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> idle_task_exit() calls mmdrop() from the idle thread, but in PREEMPT_RT all the
> allocator locks are sleeping locks - for obvious reasons scheduling away the
> idle thread gives some curious problems.
>
> Solve this by pushing the mmdrop() into an RCU callback, however we can't use
> RCU because the CPU is already down and all the local RCU state has been
> destroyed.
>
> Therefore create a new call_rcu() variant that enqueues the callback on an
> online cpu.
I am a bit nervous about the non-determinism, but on the other hand
CPU online/offline events can only happen so often due to the locking.
So...
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> ---
> include/linux/mm_types.h | 5 +++++
> include/linux/rcupreempt.h | 2 ++
> kernel/rcupreempt.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/sched.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.24.7.noarch/include/linux/mm_types.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24.7.noarch.orig/include/linux/mm_types.h
> +++ linux-2.6.24.7.noarch/include/linux/mm_types.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #include <linux/rbtree.h>
> #include <linux/rwsem.h>
> #include <linux/completion.h>
> +#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> #include <asm/page.h>
> #include <asm/mmu.h>
>
> @@ -222,6 +223,10 @@ struct mm_struct {
> /* aio bits */
> rwlock_t ioctx_list_lock;
> struct kioctx *ioctx_list;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> + struct rcu_head rcu_head;
> +#endif
> };
>
> #endif /* _LINUX_MM_TYPES_H */
> Index: linux-2.6.24.7.noarch/include/linux/rcupreempt.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24.7.noarch.orig/include/linux/rcupreempt.h
> +++ linux-2.6.24.7.noarch/include/linux/rcupreempt.h
> @@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ extern void FASTCALL(call_rcu_classic(st
> void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head)));
> extern void FASTCALL(call_rcu_preempt(struct rcu_head *head,
> void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head)));
> +extern void FASTCALL(call_rcu_preempt_online(struct rcu_head *head,
> + void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head)));
> extern void __rcu_read_lock(void);
> extern void __rcu_read_unlock(void);
> extern void __synchronize_sched(void);
> Index: linux-2.6.24.7.noarch/kernel/rcupreempt.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24.7.noarch.orig/kernel/rcupreempt.c
> +++ linux-2.6.24.7.noarch/kernel/rcupreempt.c
> @@ -916,6 +916,35 @@ void fastcall call_rcu_preempt(struct rc
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu_preempt);
>
> +void fastcall call_rcu_preempt_online(struct rcu_head *head,
> + void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu))
> +{
> + struct rcu_data *rdp;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int cpu;
> +
> + head->func = func;
> + head->next = NULL;
> +again:
> + cpu = first_cpu(cpu_online_map);
> + rdp = RCU_DATA_CPU(cpu);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&rdp->lock, flags);
> + if (unlikely(!cpu_online(cpu))) {
> + /*
> + * cpu is removed from the online map before rcu_offline_cpu
> + * is called.
> + */
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rdp->lock, flags);
> + goto again;
> + }
> +
> + *rdp->nexttail = head;
> + rdp->nexttail = &head->next;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rdp->lock, flags);
> +
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Check to see if any future RCU-related work will need to be done
> * by the current CPU, even if none need be done immediately, returning
> Index: linux-2.6.24.7.noarch/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24.7.noarch.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linux-2.6.24.7.noarch/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -5888,6 +5888,15 @@ void sched_idle_next(void)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> +void mmdrop_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> +{
> + struct mm_struct *mm = container_of(head, struct mm_struct, rcu_head);
> +
> + mmdrop(mm);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * Ensures that the idle task is using init_mm right before its cpu goes
> * offline.
> @@ -5900,7 +5909,11 @@ void idle_task_exit(void)
>
> if (mm != &init_mm)
> switch_mm(mm, &init_mm, current);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> + call_rcu_preempt_online(&mm->rcu_head, mmdrop_rcu);
> +#else
> mmdrop(mm);
> +#endif
> }
>
> /* called under rq->lock with disabled interrupts */
>
> --
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-10 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-10 11:12 [PATCH -rt 0/5] hotplug fixes Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-10 11:13 ` [PATCH -rt 1/5] cpu-hotplug: vs slab Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-10 11:13 ` [PATCH -rt 2/5] cpu-hotplug: vs page_alloc Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-10 11:13 ` [PATCH -rt 3/5] cpu-hotplug: cpu_up vs preempt-rt Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-10 11:13 ` [PATCH -rt 4/5] rcu: backport RCU cpu hotplug support Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-10 15:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-06-10 11:13 ` [PATCH -rt 5/5] cpu-hotplug: cpu_down vs preempt-rt Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-10 15:33 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2008-06-10 15:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-10 16:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-06-11 6:53 ` [PATCH -rt 6/5] " Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080610153301.GD15481@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®