From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755117AbYFJRE6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:04:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752950AbYFJREt (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:04:49 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:42444 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752511AbYFJREt (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:04:49 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:14:46 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Jan Beulich Cc: Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen , Thomas Gleixner , hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: sys32_sigsuspend()'s need for ptregs parameter Message-ID: <20080610171446.GB29289@one.firstfloor.org> References: <484E78CA.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <484E78CA.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:51:22AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > ia32entry.S has a PTREGSCALL entry for sys32_sigsuspend(), yet the > function doesn't have a struct pt_regs * parameter. What's setting up > that argument good for? Or is this just a leftover? > > Same would apply to sys_rt_sigsuspend(). Should be safe to remove. -Andi