From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760200AbYFKQ3D (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:29:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761080AbYFKQ2U (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:28:20 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:57475 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760983AbYFKQ1v (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:27:51 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:26:39 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Will Newton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-staging tree created Message-ID: <20080611162639.GE22134@kroah.com> References: <20080610190540.GA25066@kroah.com> <87a5b0800806110345v77529fc8r591f2fb4c95b5bdf@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a5b0800806110345v77529fc8r591f2fb4c95b5bdf@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:45:55AM +0100, Will Newton wrote: > > Would the linux-staging tree be an appropriate place to merge a new > architecture? Or would that be too large a change and should go via > its own tree? That is probably too big to go into -staging and should deserve its own tree based on the size of patches that have gone into creating a new architecture in the past. Do you have an example of one that is currently not included in the main kernel tree right now? thanks, greg k-h