From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759193AbYFQOQD (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:16:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757941AbYFQOPx (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:15:53 -0400 Received: from isilmar.linta.de ([213.133.102.198]:36710 "EHLO linta.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754986AbYFQOPw (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:15:52 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:15:50 +0200 From: Dominik Brodowski To: Tejun Heo Cc: Komuro , Jeff Garzik , jgarzik@redhat.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia , Kristoffer Ericson Subject: Re: [KERNEL 2.6.26-rc4] bugreport : pata_pcmcia with Sandisk Extreme III 8GB Message-ID: <20080617141549.GA490@isilmar.linta.de> Mail-Followup-To: Tejun Heo , Komuro , Jeff Garzik , jgarzik@redhat.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia , Kristoffer Ericson References: <20080607223716.7d142072.komurojun-mbn@nifty.com> <20080611072029.GB28692@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> <20080614120055.ad8fbee0.komurojun-mbn@nifty.com> <48537149.4040102@garzik.org> <20080614213612.96873c25.komurojun-mbn@nifty.com> <4855D8E2.10409@gmail.com> <20080616221145.e3b069b9.komurojun-mbn@nifty.com> <485669A0.6000404@gmail.com> <20080617212345.c452d8c5.komurojun-mbn@nifty.com> <4857C590.6050002@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4857C590.6050002@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:09:20PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > Okay. The exit is from CS_CHECK macro on GetNextTuple, missed that > macro. It means it failed to request IO resource somewhere. Can you > please try the attached patch? It will show us where it failed. > > This part of code hasn't changed at all in pata_pcmcia && I don't really > understand the tuple business. We need pcmcia people to pitch in. The strange thing is that neither the PCMCIA side nor pata_pcmcia changed between the working 2.6.26-rc4 and the non-working 2.6.26-rc3... that's why I am at least as surprised as you are ;) Thanks, Dominik