From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756571AbYFRUeR (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:34:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754193AbYFRUeF (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:34:05 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:45409 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752202AbYFRUeC (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:34:02 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: [PATCH] DRM support for new pm_ops hooks Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:35:01 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Airlie References: <200806171506.58345.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> In-Reply-To: <200806171506.58345.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200806182235.02102.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, 18 of June 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote: > The PCI linux-next branch has support for the new PM ops hooks, so I thought I > should refresh the DRM support for suspend/resume based on the new stuff. > > I think we can get away with having drivers provide just save/restore hooks > and let the core take care of the rest. When we flesh out the > prepare/complete hooks we may need another driver callback, not sure yet. > > How does it look? Good (to me). :-) Thanks, Rafael