From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752371AbYFTGac (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jun 2008 02:30:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751229AbYFTGaX (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jun 2008 02:30:23 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:50129 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750939AbYFTGaW (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jun 2008 02:30:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:29:58 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Yinghai Lu Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Dave Jones , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: make 64bit identify_cpu use cpu_dev v2 Message-ID: <20080620062958.GA31182@elte.hu> References: <200806180215.53755.yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> <200806191530.32354.yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200806191530.32354.yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Yinghai Lu wrote: > v2: fix early_panic on some conf > reason : struct cpu_vendor_dev size is 16, need to make table to be 16 > byte alignment > also print out the cpu supported... applied to tip/x86/cpu, thanks Yinghai. > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux_64.lds.S > +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux_64.lds.S > @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ SECTIONS > *(.con_initcall.init) > } > __con_initcall_end = .; > + . = ALIGN(16); > __x86cpuvendor_start = .; > .x86cpuvendor.init : AT(ADDR(.x86cpuvendor.init) - LOAD_OFFSET) { > *(.x86cpuvendor.init) ah, nice one! we broke that via v2.6.25-37-g03ae576 "x86: use ELF section to list CPU vendor specific code" - should we backport your fix to mainline right now? I'm wondering why it only triggered now - did alignment change in this section due to your changes and thus this dormant bug became triggerable? Ingo