On Friday 20 June 2008 16:44, Richard Kennedy wrote:
> reorder struct module to save space on 64 bit builds.
> saves 1 cacheline_size  (128 on default x86_64 & 64 on AMD
> Opteron/athlon) when CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD=y.
>     
> Signed-off-by: Richard Kennedy <richard@rsk.demon.co.uk>
> ---
> 
> Patch against 2.6.26-rc6. tested & running successfully on AMD64 desktop
> machine. This patch reduces the data segment of each module by 1
> cacheline size.
> 
> I also compiled with this patch for 32 bit & there was no change in
> size.

Sometime ago I did something similar. I also shrank the struct module
by ifdefing out fields which are not needed.

The patch appeared to fell through the cracks.

Here is it again with original submission text.

(Note: majoe reason for struct module's disproportionate size
is this member:

#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD
        /* Reference counts */
        struct module_ref ref[NR_CPUS];

because every array member takes entire cacheline (by design):

struct module_ref
{
        local_t count;
} ____cacheline_aligned;

I guess the solution is to not select CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD...


On Friday 14 September 2007 00:30, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> module.c and module.h conatains code for finding
> exported symbols which are declared with EXPORT_UNUSED_SYMBOL,
> and this code is compiled in even if CONFIG_UNUSED_SYMBOLS is not set
> and thus there can be no EXPORT_UNUSED_SYMBOLs in modules anyway
> (because EXPORT_UNUSED_SYMBOL(x) are compiled out to nothing then).
> 
> This patch adds required #ifdefs.
> 
> This shrinks module.o and each *.ko file.
> 
> Patch also regroups some struct module members so
> that on 64 bit CPUs we are not wasting 32 bits on padding here:
> 
>         const struct kernel_symbol *unused_syms;
>         unsigned int num_unused_syms;
>         const unsigned long *unused_crcs;
> 
> It groups counters and pointers separately.
> 
> Patch makes small edit to help text of CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD -
> it explicitly says that without that option, kernel
> will be also faster, not only "smaller and simpler".
> When I realized how much churn is going on under the hood
> in order to make module unloading possible, I felt that
> users are not informed well enough about it in the help text.
> 
> And finally, structure members which hold length of module
> code (four such members there) and count of symbols
> are converted from longs to ints.
> 
> We cannot possibly have a module where 32 bits won't
> be enough to hold such counts.
> 
> For one, module loading checks module size for sanity
> before loading, so such insanely big module will fail
> that test first.
> 
> In short, patch makes trivial changes which are "obviously correct"
> (famous last words).
> 
> Patch is compile tested with various combinations of CONFIGs.
> 
> Please put it into -mm.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>