From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1760389AbYFZSVc@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1760389AbYFZSVc (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:21:32 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755246AbYFZSVV
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:21:21 -0400
Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:60554 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753170AbYFZSVT (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:21:19 -0400
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 25
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:23:10 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012)
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>, kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
References: <20080626003554.b2623aba.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <200806261249.24340.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080627002100.396d5cbb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <20080627002100.396d5cbb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200806262023.11338.rjw@sisk.pl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thursday, 26 of June 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:49:23 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >
> > > I guess this got in through Rusty's tree, right?
> > > 
> > > Does the patch below fix it please?
> > 
> > Yes, it does.
> 
> I have applied this patch to today's linux-next tree.

Thanks!