[PATCH 18/30] sched: hierarchical load vs affine wakeups

[Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>]

[-- Attachment #1: sched-wake_affine.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1506 bytes --]

With hierarchical grouping we can't just compare task weight to rq weight - we
need to scale the weight appropriately.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
 kernel/sched_fair.c |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -1071,6 +1071,25 @@ static inline int wake_idle(int cpu, str
 
 static const struct sched_class fair_sched_class;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
+static unsigned long task_h_load(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	unsigned long h_load = p->se.load.weight;
+	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(&p->se);
+
+	update_h_load(task_cpu(p));
+
+	h_load = calc_delta_mine(h_load, cfs_rq->h_load, &cfs_rq->load);
+
+	return h_load;
+}
+#else
+static unsigned long task_h_load(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	return p->se.load.weight;
+}
+#endif
+
 static int
 wake_affine(struct rq *rq, struct sched_domain *this_sd, struct rq *this_rq,
 	    struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int this_cpu, int sync,
@@ -1091,9 +1110,9 @@ wake_affine(struct rq *rq, struct sched_
 	 * of the current CPU:
 	 */
 	if (sync)
-		tl -= current->se.load.weight;
+		tl -= task_h_load(current);
 
-	balanced = 100*(tl + p->se.load.weight) <= imbalance*load;
+	balanced = 100*(tl + task_h_load(p)) <= imbalance*load;
 
 	/*
 	 * If the currently running task will sleep within

--