From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754696AbYGFGNq (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jul 2008 02:13:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751436AbYGFGNh (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jul 2008 02:13:37 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:57873 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751349AbYGFGNg (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jul 2008 02:13:36 -0400 Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 08:13:11 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, "David S. Miller" , Peter Anvin , Arjan van de Ven , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: the printk problem Message-ID: <20080706061311.GA23606@elte.hu> References: <20080704104634.GA31634@digi.com> <20080704111540.ddffd241.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1215212420.8970.8.camel@pasglop> <20080706052741.GA18928@elte.hu> <20080706055317.GA4212@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080706055317.GA4212@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Ingo Molnar wrote: > yeah, agreed, combined it's not an x86 topic anymore. > > [ There's some lkml trouble so i've missed the earlier patch. I'm not > sure the email problem is on my side, see how incomplete the > discussion is on lkml.org as well: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/25/170 ] > > Anyway, i have have added this second patch of yours to > tip/core/printk and moved your first patch over to that topic (which > relies on it). ah, i found the reason - it started out on linux-ia64 originally then moved over to lkml - so only half of the discussion was visible there. And linux-ia64 is one of the few vger lists i'm not subscribed to apparently. (there's no vger-please-give-me-all-emails list - making the following of Linux development even harder) Ingo