mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com,
	mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, davem@davemloft.net,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, Martine.Silbermann@hp.com,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PCI MSI: Store the number of messages in the msi_desc
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:19:14 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080707161914.GB14894@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080707160203.GA7521@colo.lackof.org>

On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 10:02:03AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
> > -	if (!entry->dev || entry->msi_attrib.type != PCI_CAP_ID_MSI)
> > +	if (!entry->dev || entry->msi_attrib.is_msix)
> >  		return;
> 
> This is why I don't like bit fields.
> "uninitialized" (3rd state) doesn't exist.
> Is there something else in place to catch that state?
> 
> (It's clearly a bug if someone did that and maybe I'm
> being too paranoid.)

msi_descs are only allocated in two places, one of which sets is_msix
and the other doesn't.  I wouldn't object to passing parameters to
alloc_msi_entry() so there's only one place that fills in is_msix, but
yes, I do think the current code is too paranoid.

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-07 16:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-03  2:44 Multiple MSI Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-03  3:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-07-03  3:59   ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-03  4:41     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-07-03  6:44       ` Michael Ellerman
2008-07-03  9:10         ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-07-03  9:17           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-07-03 11:31             ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-03 11:41               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-07-04  1:52                 ` Michael Ellerman
2008-07-04  8:08                   ` Alan Cox
2008-07-03 11:34       ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-07 16:17   ` Grant Grundler
2008-07-07 16:39     ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-07 16:51       ` Grant Grundler
2008-07-07 23:06     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-07-10  0:55     ` Michael Ellerman
2008-07-05 13:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-05 13:34   ` [PATCH 1/4] PCI MSI: Store the number of messages in the msi_desc Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-07  2:05     ` Michael Ellerman
2008-07-07  2:41       ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-07  3:26         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-07-07  3:48         ` Michael Ellerman
2008-07-07 12:04           ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-07 16:02             ` Grant Grundler
2008-07-07 16:19               ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2008-07-10  1:32             ` Michael Ellerman
2008-07-10  1:35               ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-05 13:34   ` [PATCH 2/4] PCI: Support multiple MSI Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-07  2:05     ` Michael Ellerman
2008-07-07  2:45       ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-07  3:56         ` Michael Ellerman
2008-07-07 11:31           ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-10  1:32             ` Michael Ellerman
2008-07-10  1:43               ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-10  4:00                 ` Michael Ellerman
2008-07-05 13:34   ` [PATCH 3/4] AHCI: Request multiple MSIs Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-07 16:45     ` Grant Grundler
2008-07-07 17:48       ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-20  7:49         ` Grant Grundler
2008-07-05 13:34   ` [PATCH 4/4] x86-64: Support for " Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-05 13:43   ` Multiple MSI Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-05 22:38     ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080707161914.GB14894@parisc-linux.org \
    --to=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=Martine.Silbermann@hp.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome