From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755218AbYGKW7T (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:59:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752648AbYGKW7M (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:59:12 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:55717 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752149AbYGKW7L (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:59:11 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:58:44 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: David Howells Cc: Alan Cox , jirislaby@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix a const assignment in moxa_load_fw() Message-Id: <20080711155844.efab6a96.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <26525.1215816501@redhat.com> References: <20080711122056.8b36c084.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080708154416.24850.30733.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20080708171029.08db0f4d@the-village.bc.nu> <26525.1215816501@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:48:21 +0100 David Howells wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Appears to already be fixed in linux-next, perhaps by this: > > Some of the maintainers have already pushed through the patches I've sent to > you and them. > No, that was a week-old tree - the warning was fixed independently. As they often are - everyone gets to watch them fly past so lots of people are motivated to fix them, and are able to test their fixes. linux-next would be a better tree against which to do this sort of thing. Doing that would avoid this wasted effort, plus linux-next has lots of nice new warnings to keep us occupied.