From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758247AbYGOWrp (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:47:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757027AbYGOWr3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:47:29 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:54899 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756917AbYGOWr2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:47:28 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:47:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20080715.154727.176966436.davem@davemloft.net> To: greg@kroah.com Cc: pageexec@freemail.hu, tytso@mit.edu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [stable] Linux 2.6.25.10 From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20080715223910.GA6500@kroah.com> References: <20080715183351.GF8185@mit.edu> <487D249C.19043.1BE04D4D@pageexec.freemail.hu> <20080715223910.GA6500@kroah.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Greg KH Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:39:10 -0700 > The -stable commits are exactly the same as they are in mainline > (Linus's tree). Are you upset by the fact that I am not saying, "Hey, > look, here's a bugfix that might be security related and here's how to > reproduce it!" in big flashing letters? Don't sweat it Greg. This complaint about "full disclosure" is coming from someone who isn't even willing to communicate with the world using his real name. The ultimate irony, in my book :-)