From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755585AbYGVIlc (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:41:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753554AbYGVIlS (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:41:18 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:54722 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753341AbYGVIlR (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:41:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 01:40:43 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "xemul@openvz.org" , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2][-mm][resend] res_counter limit change support ebusy Message-Id: <20080722014043.92272350.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080714171154.e1cc9943.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20080714171154.e1cc9943.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:11:54 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > +static inline int res_counter_set_limit(struct res_counter *cnt, > + unsigned long long limit) > +{ > + unsigned long flags; > + int ret = -EBUSY; > + > + spin_lock_irqsave(&cnt->lock, flags); > + if (cnt->usage < limit) { > + cnt->limit = limit; > + ret = 0; > + } > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cnt->lock, flags); > + return ret; > +} Need I say it? This function is waaaaaay too large to be inlined.