From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>, Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 14:38:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080726123819.GC20713@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080725211117.586723000@polaris-admin.engr.sgi.com>
* Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:
> This patchset provides the following:
>
> * x86_64: Cleanup setup_percpu by fixing some minor potential
> problems as well as add some debugging aids.
>
> * x86_64: Rebase per cpu variables to zero
>
> Rebase per cpu variables to zero in preparation for the following
> patch to fold the pda into the per cpu area.
>
> * x86_64: Fold pda into per cpu area
>
> Declare the pda as a per cpu variable. This will allow the per cpu
> variables to be accessible on the x86_64 using %gs as the base of
> the percpu areas for each cpu:
>
> %gs:per_cpu_xxxx
>
> * x86_64: Reference zero-based percpu variables offset from gs
>
> Actually implement the above operation for __get_cpu_var() and
> __put_cpu_var(). Since this is now a single instruction, we
> can remove the non-preemptible versions of x86_read_percpu()
> and x86_write_percpu().
>
> Note that the following changes are NOT in this patchset as the plan now
> seems to be that the common (to x86) variables that are in the pda should
> be made individual per cpu variables, leaving only the stack canary in place.
>
> * x86_64: Replace cpu_pda ops with percpu ops
> * x86_64: Replace xxx_pda() operations with x86_xxx_percpu().
> * x86_64: Remove xxx_pda() operations
> * x86_64: Remove cpu_pda() macro
>
> Based on linux-2.6.tip/master.
i've added these patches to tip/x86/percpu-zerobased, but not yet merged
into tip/master. I've made it -git based - does this patchset have any
functional dependencies on other patches?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-26 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-25 21:11 Mike Travis
2008-07-25 21:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86_64: Cleanup early setup_percpu references Mike Travis
2008-07-25 21:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86_64: Base percpu variables at zero Mike Travis
2008-07-25 21:11 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86_64: Fold pda into per cpu area Mike Travis
2008-07-25 21:11 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86_64: Reference zero-based percpu variables offset from gs Mike Travis
2008-07-25 23:26 ` [PATCH 0/4] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-26 0:27 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-26 0:30 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-26 12:38 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-07-28 18:33 ` Mike Travis
2008-07-28 15:52 ` [crash] " Ingo Molnar
2008-07-28 19:39 ` Mike Travis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080726123819.GC20713@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome