From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, matt@bluehost.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] task IO accounting: improve code readability
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:33:23 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080727163323.GA1802@tv-sign.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1217172555-8335-1-git-send-email-righi.andrea@gmail.com>
On 07/27, Andrea Righi wrote:
>
> Put all i/o statistics in struct proc_io_accounting and use inline functions to
> initialize and increment statistics, removing a lot of single variable
> assignments.
Imho, the change like this is obviously good, but can't we simplify
this a little bit? Just make
struct task_io_accounting
{
#ifdef CONFIG_TASK_XACCT
/* bytes read */
u64 rchar;
/* bytes written */
u64 wchar;
/* # of read syscalls */
u64 syscr;
/* # of write syscalls */
u64 syscw;
#endif /* CONFIG_TASK_XACCT */
#ifdef CONFIG_TASK_IO_ACCOUNTING
/*
* The number of bytes which this task has caused to be read from
* storage.
*/
u64 read_bytes;
/*
* The number of bytes which this task has caused, or shall cause to be
* written to disk.
*/
u64 write_bytes;
/*
* A task can cause "negative" IO too. If this task truncates some
* dirty pagecache, some IO which another task has been accounted for
* (in its write_bytes) will not be happening. We _could_ just
* subtract that from the truncating task's write_bytes, but there is
* information loss in doing that.
*/
u64 cancelled_write_bytes;
#endif
};
This should make the patch much smaller with the same effect, no?
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-27 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-27 15:29 Andrea Righi
2008-07-27 16:33 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2008-07-27 21:53 ` Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080727163323.GA1802@tv-sign.ru \
--to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@bluehost.com \
--cc=righi.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®