From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759025AbYG3WSl (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:18:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753461AbYG3WS2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:18:28 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:60760 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752436AbYG3WS1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:18:27 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:18:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20080730.151826.58205352.davem@davemloft.net> To: bhutchings@solarflare.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, jgarzik@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, matthew@wil.cx, holt@sgi.com, linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com Subject: Re: [Patch] fix ia64 build failure when CONFIG_SFC=m From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20080730133527.GI10471@solarflare.com> References: <20080729174839.GG10471@solarflare.com> <20080729.140040.72089155.davem@davemloft.net> <20080730133527.GI10471@solarflare.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ben Hutchings Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:35:29 +0100 > So far as I can see, hardly anyone is doing routing at 10G speeds on Linux. > If they were, the horrible interaction with LRO would presumably have been > found and fixed earlier. This assumes a precise intersection between those doing 10G routing and their using chips with LRO capable drivers. All of the 10G equipment I have here and do testing on use drivers that lack LRO support.