From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Marc Pignat <marc.pignat@hevs.ch>
Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>,
"Mark M. Hoffman" <mhoffman@lightlink.com>,
Tobias Himmer <tobias@himmer-online.de>,
"Hans J. Koch" <hjk@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH v2] hwmon: ADC124S501 generic driver
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:27:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080730032729.75033fc7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200807301216.01125.marc.pignat@hevs.ch>
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:16:00 +0200 Marc Pignat <marc.pignat@hevs.ch> wrote:
> SPI driver for analog to digital converters national semiconductor ADC081S101,
> ADC124S501, ...
>
> Code for 8 channels by : Tobias Himmer <tobias@himmer-online.de>
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Pignat <marc.pignat@hevs.ch>
> ---
>
> Hi all!
>
> patch against 2.6.27-rc1, tested on a custom arm board and only compile-tested
> on x86.
>
> This driver add support for National Semiconductor ADC<bb><c>S<sss> chip family,
> where:
> * bb is the resolution in number of bits (8, 10, 12)
> * c is the number of channels (1, 2, 4, 8)
> * sss is the maximum conversion speed (021 for 200 kSPS, 051 for 500
> kSPS and 101 for 1 MSPS)
>
> Changes from v1:
> * error recovery fixed
> * support for 8 channels, thanks to Tobias
> * better CodingStyle
>
> Thanks for your comments and testing ;)
>
I think you forgot this bit:
diff -puN drivers/hwmon/adcxx.c~hwmon-adc124s501-generic-driver-cleanup drivers/hwmon/adcxx.c
--- a/drivers/hwmon/adcxx.c~hwmon-adc124s501-generic-driver-cleanup
+++ a/drivers/hwmon/adcxx.c
@@ -61,7 +61,6 @@ static ssize_t adcxx_read(struct device
struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
struct adcxx *adc = dev_get_drvdata(&spi->dev);
-
u8 tx_buf[2] = { attr->index << 3 }; /* other bits are don't care */
u8 rx_buf[2];
int status;
@@ -100,7 +99,6 @@ static ssize_t adcxx_show_max(struct dev
{
struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
struct adcxx *adc = dev_get_drvdata(&spi->dev);
-
u32 reference;
if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&adc->lock))
@@ -118,7 +116,6 @@ static ssize_t adcxx_set_max(struct devi
{
struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
struct adcxx *adc = dev_get_drvdata(&spi->dev);
-
unsigned long value;
if (strict_strtoul(buf, 10, &value))
_
OK?
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> index 00ff533..9c4a579 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> @@ -390,6 +390,22 @@ config SENSORS_LM70
> This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> will be called lm70.
>
> +config SENSORS_ADCXX
> + tristate "National Semiconductor ADCxxxSxxx"
> + depends on SPI_MASTER && EXPERIMENTAL
> + help
> + If you say yes here you get support for the National Semiconductor
> + ADC<bb><c>S<sss> chip family, where
> + * bb is the resolution in number of bits (8, 10, 12)
> + * c is the number of channels (1, 2, 4)
> + * sss is the maximum conversion speed (021 for 200 kSPS, 051 for 500
> + kSPS and 101 for 1 MSPS)
> +
> + Examples : ADC081S101, ADC124S501, ...
> +
> + This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> + will be called adcxx.
hm, I wonder if it really needs to be EXPERIMENTAL.
> +static struct spi_driver adcxx1s_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "adcxx1s",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + },
> + .probe = adcxx1s_probe,
> + .remove = __devexit_p(adcxx_remove),
> +};
> +
> +static struct spi_driver adcxx2s_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "adcxx2s",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + },
> + .probe = adcxx2s_probe,
> + .remove = __devexit_p(adcxx_remove),
> +};
> +
> +static struct spi_driver adcxx4s_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "adcxx4s",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + },
> + .probe = adcxx4s_probe,
> + .remove = __devexit_p(adcxx_remove),
> +};
Is suspend/resume support needed on this device?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-30 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-30 10:16 Marc Pignat
2008-07-30 10:27 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-07-30 10:44 ` Hans J. Koch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080730032729.75033fc7.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=hjk@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=marc.pignat@hevs.ch \
--cc=mhoffman@lightlink.com \
--cc=tobias@himmer-online.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome