From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757766AbYGaBa7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:30:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753820AbYGaBao (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:30:44 -0400 Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]:47581 "EHLO kirsty.vergenet.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752944AbYGaBan (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:30:43 -0400 Message-Id: <20080731012208.115225969@vergenet.net> User-Agent: quilt/0.46-1 Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:22:08 +1000 To: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Vivek Goyal , Andrew Morton From: Simon Horman Subject: [patch 0/6] is_kdump_kernel() cleanup and related patches Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, this patch series contains all the patches (that I am aware of) that have recently been posted regarding kdump and in particular is_kdump_kernel() For Andrew Morton's benefit I have annotated each patch as to whether it needs to be included in 2.6.27 or not. My conclusion is that while I would like to see all of the patches included in 2.6.27, none of them are particularly dire, and thus they could all wait until post-2.6.27. -- Horms