mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kbuild now support arch/$ARCH/include - time for ARCHs to convert
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:14:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080731201444.GC25305@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080731182315.GA18060@linux-mips.org>

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 07:23:15PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:05:00PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> 
> > The traditional location of the arch specific Makefiles
> > has been at:
> > 
> > 	include/asm-$ARCH
> > 
> > But as suggested by several people over time and lately
> > by Linus in the following post:
> > http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2008/5/21/1903924
> > 
> > is is suggested to move the arch specific files under arch/
> > and for the header files this is arch/$ARCH/include.
> > 
> > So I have hacked up support for this in kbuild so
> > for the simpler cases a simple move of header files as
> > in:
> > 	git mv include/asm-$ARCH arch/$ARCH/include/asm
> > 
> > is enough.
> > 
> > If Linus will accept it then I think -rc1 is a perfect
> > time to do it as people has less stuff pending touching
> > the header files that are moved.
> > Validation is easy - does the usual configs build?
> > 
> > For the archs that plays games with symlinks this is a
> > splendid opportunity to get rid af these.
> > The receipe is simple:
> > Use 
> > 	KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Iarch/$ARCH/include/$CPU
> > 
> > to select the CPU and then do a copy of the header files
> > like this:
> > 
> > 	git mv include/asm-$ARCH/$CPU arch/$ARCH/include/$CPU/cpu
> > 
> > Then the code can continue to use:
> > 
> > 	#include <cpu/foo.h>
> > 
> > I already converted sparc to use arch/sparc/include -
> > while I merged the header files for sparc and sparc64.
> > This change is already upstream.
> > 
> > And for SH I posted a receipe which you can read here:
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/28/83
> > 
> > It is SH specific but anyway pretty generic.
> > 
> > I am limited in time and resources at the moment but I
> > would be glad to help out as time permits should there
> > be any questions.
> 
> I just did the necessary changes for MIPS and the first testbuild is running
> successfully so far.
> 
> One of the ugly things in the MIPS makefiles is the use of platform-
> specific headers in include/asm-mips/mach-* which contain platform specific
> headers.  Ideally those should be included through something like
> <mach/somefile.h> or <plat/something.h> and I think a directory like
> arch/$ARCH/$PLATFORM/include/plat/foobar.h could be a good place in the
> new scheme?  I assume other platforms have similar issues with subplatforms,
> processor sub-architectures etc.?

I like it. And rmk suggested something similar so I dragged you into
that thread (on linux-arm-kernel). Let's continue there.

	Sam

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-31 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-28 20:05 Sam Ravnborg
2008-07-29  3:06 ` Kyle McMartin
2008-07-29  3:27   ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-07-29 14:21     ` Kyle McMartin
2008-08-09  2:50       ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-07-30  6:49 ` Greg Ungerer
2008-07-30  7:07   ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-07-30  8:52     ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-07-30  8:38   ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-08-01  6:03     ` Greg Ungerer
2008-08-03 20:16       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-08-04  0:34         ` Greg Ungerer
2008-08-04  5:10           ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-08-04 14:35         ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-04 16:00           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-08-04 16:45             ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-07-30  9:34   ` David Howells
2008-07-30 12:26     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-07-31  3:23       ` Paul Mundt
2008-07-31  7:17         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-07-31 11:26           ` Greg Ungerer
2008-07-31 19:47         ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-07-31 20:13           ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-08-01  7:35             ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-01 16:46               ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-07-31 18:23 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-07-31 20:14   ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2008-08-09  2:52   ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-08-09  3:09     ` Paul Mundt
2008-08-09  7:03       ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-08-09  7:20         ` Russell King
2008-08-09 11:13           ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-08-01  8:35 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2008-08-01 16:49   ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-08-05  4:18 ` Rusty Russell
2008-08-05 17:16   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-08-05 20:45   ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-08-05 22:06     ` Russell King
2008-08-06 19:21       ` Russell King
2008-08-06 19:28         ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-08-06 19:51           ` Russell King
2008-08-06 19:27       ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-08-09  7:28 ` Sam Ravnborg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080731201444.GC25305@uranus.ravnborg.org \
    --to=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome